12 January, 2008

Heckscher Playground in NYC

Received Saturday, January 12, 2008
In the restrooms at Heckscher Playground today, (1/12), I saw a overweight nanny in stretch pants and tennis shoes with scrunchy socks-pants tucked in-yelling the crap out of a precious 2 or 3 year old girl. The girl looked like a doll and had pretty long hair that was strawberry blonde, pale skin and was wearing a yellow cuffed jacket but the jacket itself was a brownish color. The nanny didn't care at all about shielding the girl from the other people in the bathroom, including myself and one cracked out looking punk looking chic missing a tooth. The poor child was exposed and wasn't helped properly off the seat-although she asked and needed to be on account of her height. The child fell to the side and landed-ew-on the floor back by the wall. The nanny acted all pissed off about it. The child had the right to be pissed. What the hell? Listen up nanny, it is your job to take a child to a public bathroom and HELP her. That is what you are getting paid for. Also, nanny did not wash her hands or the childs. Disgusting. Nanny had very crispy looking ethnic hair, smooth and oily at the skull and then crispy as it jutted out. Nanny wore no make up and had large teeth for her mouth. The AA nanny was wearing a pull over hoody that was grey and black. (No zipper).

96 comments:

Anonymous said...

I cannot take someone seriously when they describe someone they don't know as a 'cracked out punk chic' or from someone who does not know how to spell chick.

§marypoppin'pills§ said...

Crispy hair? Um ... several months back somebody else described a Nanny with 'crispy' hair.

Anyway - did you get a chance to say anything, OP?
I'm not sure I would've held my tongue on this one ... too many witnesses.

P.S. 10:19 ~
Where I'm from, they spell it like that, too. (slang - chic)

Upstate Mom said...

OP wasn't describing the nanny as punked out crack head (or whatever)....she was describing a witness in the bathroom like that. I can't believe not teaching a child privacy in the restroom....especially a public one!! This is where emotional damage as well as vulnerability to stalkers/pedophiles happens. I hope someone recognizes this kid and tells the parents. Forget about how she was being yelled at...I am much more concerned about the way the girl was exposed to strangers.

J said...

I love white women who come on here posting about "ethnic" nannies with "crispy" hair and how mean they are to the beautiful little curly-haired porcelain china doll children.

I mean, let's be fair-- if the nanny treated the child badly, she treated the child badly and she deserves some crap for that. But leave your obvious racism at the door when posting.

Yes, I'm white too. I'm just not ignorant.

Anonymous said...

6:21...

are you SURE about that last statement?

jojo said...

J.
some peope spend tons of money in that section of CVS looking for products that matte their hair to their skull and other products that crip up the ends. Just an observation. If you lived in the Bronx, like I do, you would know OP is describing a specific style.
Many times, you will see this style tinted magenta.

Stick that it your liberal hat and sail away.

Anonymous said...

If you spell chick chic, how do you spell chic, as in fashionable?

mom said...

You know, sometimes when a person tries to do an ADEQUATE job of describing how a person looks, they have to simply tell it like it is. Describing somebody as having crispy hair does not mean she does not like black women...or even that she doesn't like crispy hair. The nanny had crispy hair. Period. I formed an immediate (and I would guess fairly accurate) mental picture of this woman based on the very detailed description. Same for the scary looking punked out restroom visitor. Isn't that the point, after all?

If these people who dress and groom themselves in these ways felt they were so horrible as to be considered "insults" when accurately described, I assume they would change their "styles" up a bit. This is how they choose to portray themselves to the world, and when they are accurately described as such, it reflects nothing more than pure fact.
Perhaps it is actually those who protest so much about "racism" in these posts who are actually the more racist. I mean, how is saying something about a person being black bad...unless your own underlying belief is that being black is somehow bad?

Now, enough of trying to scrape up, or make up, up any tiny thing you possibly can to attack every single OP.

Upstate Mom said...

Would anyone else please comment on the deplorable way this woman, whatever her description or relation to the child in her care, was behaving???

tree said...

I would fire a nanny if she didn't help the child in the bathroom and was hired to do so. The poor little girl asked for help and the nanny ignore her and the girl fell and the nanny got upset because she fell? Who is the child able to rely on and what kind of guardian does the girl have when her parents aren't around?

Kate in CO said...

To HECK with the description....the OP did her best! If you are this child's parent reading this...LISTEN UP!..if your nanny treats your child this way in public....IMAGINE how she's treating your little girl in PRIVATE! UUUUUGH! I hope this fat lazy jerk gets fired. Poor little girl.

Anonymous said...

Kate in co
Just curious. Are you ever happy?

Anonymous said...

This nanny is a complete worthless piece of cra* and needs to be fired. What a sad sighting. I agree, if she treats the child like this in public, who knows what she does at home. Also, no handwashing- great example dirty scum nanny. Hope you are proud of yourself.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
mom said...

I had a friend who always let her very small children use the bathroom by themselves, just as you describe here. I saw what they did because the stall door was always open. I cringed as they ran their little hands along the edge of the bowl, walked in little puddles of who knows what (quite often barefoot) and touched the wet, pee splattered seats. They we would walk out without her having the kids even wash their hands...even if we were about to eat. I am almost gagging just thinking about it now as I write, and it was over a decade ago. Meanwhile, germophobic little me was covering my son's seat with layers of paper, making sure no part of his body touched any surface, teaching him how to flush public toilets with either his foot or a piece of toilet paper in his hand, scrubbing his hands myself and then opening the exit door of the restroom with a piece of paper towel (in case somebody like her and her kids had gone out just before me and "infected" the door handle). She is probably somewhere busy writing about her neurotically clean friend at this very moment! heeehee

PS My friend was Christian and middle class. Is there some point to be made above about the mom being Jewish and wealthy...or is that simply the person from yesterday who is trying to start some racial argument...again? (Tiresome)

Jane Doe said...

Mom,
Wealthy would have been sufficient.

Comment deleted.

Kate in CO said...

6:03.....I'm not unhappy....I just get steamed when people start to nit-pick at the post and not be appalled at the situation described. (You're nit-picking at me...but, I can take it. I like to see people stick to the post and the problem described.) It's children that I care about. I don't claim to love the children I watch like I love my own kids.....but, I do treat them with respect and act in love toward them. I am paid, just like a nanny is, to take care of them......and this website is here to expose the LACK of care that nannies give. Happiness (mine or a nanny's) doesn't factor into how a child should be treated. I'm pretty happy..... most of the time. 'Hope you are.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if Jane Doe would care to explain why my comment was deleted? I did not swear in it nor did I say or imply anything off color.

I posted about a mom who let her child use the bathroom alone in Van Saun Zoo. Her child was about three and alone until the mother and her young son entered the bathroom. The child was Barefoot and fell in a puddle of God Knows what! What kind of woman lets her kid go into a public restroom BAREFOOT!!!!

Am I to assume that you can't say the family was Jewish and that's why it was deleted? There was no guesswork involved in figuring that out as the woman wore the long skirt, covered elbows and hat and the boy had on a yamakah (sp?) Is saying that any more racist than calling someone black with crunchy hair, fat or hispanic because I see those sorts of descriptions on here all the time...

Anonymous said...

Now I read the comments its ridiculous why it was deleted. Why the hell are people on here allowed to talk about Race in their descriptions all the time when it comes to other races but NOT say someoen is Jewish what a double standard. And no I am not the same one from yesterday.

Anonymous said...

I suspect it is fine to talk about race when it is relevant, such as in describing a person in order to make them recognizable to the parents, or some other such functional purpose. You seemed very intent on making sure we knew the offending mom was Jewish, and the purpose for that was quite unclear. It seemed possibly intended to simply disparage a Jewish woman, or else to start a racially charged argument. Jane Doe was right to remove it, as we have an intentional troublemaker trolling the site on a regular basis.

paul the intern said...

Racial descriptions are necessary in the submitted posts but not needed in the posts. The point of the woman being Jewish seemed to have no purpose at all in your little comment. So it's gone.

Anonymous said...

So why is the reference to a person being Christian still up there? AND Jane Doe responded to that post but left that up. I don't get it. All kinds of comments both in the blog and on the comments areas mention all sorts of things about race and physical appearance. The only thing that gets deleted is a Jewish reference...but a few posts later a Christian reference is left up. Just seems like a serious double standard going. on.

Upstate Mom said...

The person who posted about a Christian woman, did so after she read the (now deleted) post about the Jewish woman. So, it was relevant at that time, because it pointed out that there is not just one "type" of person who lets children go to public restrooms barefoot, just like there is not one "type" of nanny who mistreats their charge. It's just that since the posters after the original, didn't need to use any descriptive words because they weren't trying to help a parent recognize their nanny and/or children in order to protect them. Both messages could be edited and/or removed for those reasons mentioned by the intern. My guess is the second, and now subsequent posts weren't deleted as an oversight, not a double standard. Not much is deleted from this site as I can see.

paul the intern said...

8:56
Although we do not have any obligation to monitor comments on this blog..............

again...
Although we do not have any obligation to monitor comments on this blog......

I highly suggest you take your giant schnozz (nose in everything) and move on to some other blog where you can cause some sort of racial panic. Go on now, scat.

double standard, my ass.

mom said...

I posted the comment after the one that was deleted. I mentioned my friend being Christian as a PS, specifically for the reason the person at 9:20 suggested. I wanted to make it clear that I did not understand why the previous poster had made such a point of "proving" that the woman she mentioned was Jewish, because it was completely irrelevant to the post...unless she was trying to start something ugly about Jewish moms.
It's not bad to mention somebody is part of a certain group. It's only bad if you are trying to make it into a negative, as the deleted post seemed to be doing.

BTW, I'm Christian myself, but was taken aback at the post about the Jewish mom...if that helps curb your frenzy about the possibility that Jane Doe is "biased."

Now get over it already.

Anonymous said...

I get you Mom. Some people are just out to corrupt and ruin. That's not how I roll. I think Jane is a Budhist though, she's always quoting the dali llama.

§marypoppin'pills§ said...

Wow. Once again, I miss all the 'fun'.
I should rearrange my schedule so that I'm around for all the excitement.
Not.

Paul the Intern,
I'm no 'Johnny come lately' ... but you're with ISYN?

Anonymous said...

My point is proven by the fact that the Jewish reference was deleted but the Christian one is STILL up there. But then again, what can I expect from a site that has the same people here day after day, possibly hour after hour reading posts (most of them sound fake) where children are being abused or neglected. And if a good sighting is posted, it gets hardly any notice.

And for the LAST time....I onlt posted her descrirtion as that which could not be said on here because I thought is was the norm! I have seen references to people being fat, crunchy haired, ghetto style, greasy, hispanic etc. ZI had no idea that pointing out someones race/religion would be such a crime if they were THAT race'relgion. So put that in your paranoid pipes and smoke it because Until the reference to someone being Christian is taken down as well, as I started out you just prove my point that a double standard exists here.

PS You can't always tell if a person is CHRISTIAN by their style of dress BUT you CAN tell if
Someone is J------, Muslim or Hindu By their outside appearance and again THAT'S why I posted it to give an ACCURATE description. Had she wore a Sari I would have said she was Hindu. DOUBLE STANDARD HERE!!!!!

mom said...

MaryPP,
You missed nothing.
And since she is still here harping, it makes me suspect that it is probably "she who licks boots"...which makes it less than worth mentioning again. There were just too many "openings' left on too many threads yesterday for us to miss spotting her negative presence.

ro said...

750 AM medicate yourself.
What kind of nut comes on a board repeatedly and says a bunch of stupid ass stuff but doesnt have the balls to use a name? We don't respect you anonymous freaky zealot. No, we don't respect you at all.

Bite me.

fg said...

7:50 "For the last time...", you say? Good. Now, shut up.

§marypoppin'pills§ said...

I am very familiar with her writing style. I've studied handwriting analysis/personalities ... and although it is hard to do it on a computer, some people have 'quirks'.
And yes, I'm pretty sure it is 'her'.
Most people don't even recognize that they have a certain style of writing and they do it subconsciously.
Even if you were to respond to some posts anonymously, I think you know you would be pretty easy to spot. ☺ (Providing you didn't make a huge attempt trying to hide yourself!)
One good example (and please don't be offended! You are a very passionate writer) ... would be 'Kate in Co.' - you would easily know her if she were to post anonymously. (Again, providing she stayed true to her personality).
Now let's wait for the denial ...

§mpp§ said...

^^^^
Sorry ... that post was for Mom.

Anonymous said...

7:50 am, you do make some valid points, but I think you are being a little over zealous. I, too, was wondering why you pointed out that the woman was Jewish, but I think you've explained yourself adequately.

I think the problem is, not everyone is as familiar with internet etiquette, and I also think we sometimes forget that. I can see how someone who's not 'net savvy' or that familiar with this site could think that pointing out the race/religion was proper. I can also see how someone would further question why certain references are OK and certain ones aren't. And, regardless of how this person may have come across, he/she does make a valid point. I am not defending anyone or taking any sides, I am just looking at it objectively. As for choosing the anonymous signature, maybe this person doesn't blog enough, or doesn't know enough about the internet to register, or perhaps he/she just doesn't care to pick a silly handle. I mean really, would we respect his/her opinions any more if he/she had posted under the name 'goldunGrrrll' or
'L8t2Sk8t'? Which, by the way is exactly the reason why I post as anonymous, I just don't care to register nor can I think up a cute or clever handle. Peace people.

Anonymous said...

JD a Buddhist? Now there's a bit of speculating. That's how rumours begin, mate. Not that there is anything wrong with Buddhists or the Dalai Llama. A peaceful, loving lot they are.

mom said...

MaryPP,
So what do you think? Coincidence or not that 2:52 both defends "she" and signs off with "Peace"?

Anonymous said...

Wow, some of you guys are really paranoid. Whoever this person was, "she" must have done a lot of emotional damage. I was trying to be the voice of reason, and maybe trying to give the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps I am not on here enough to be seeing trolls in every post I dislike or disagree with.

fg said...

I don't think she "did" any emotional damage so much as that she is "emotionally damaged".
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/troller.htm

fg said...

or may 'she' is a combo of Troll and:
Stealth prefers to go into battle disguised or heavily camouflaged, often using pseudonyms, anonymous mail servers and multiple e mail addresses. Operating from a position of anonymity he can launch vicious attacks with little fear of reprisals. Because of his cowardice Stealth is often dismissed by other Warriors as an unworthy adversary.

mom said...

Never mind MaryPP and fg,
"She" tipped her had at 4:20. It was her at 2:52 as well. She is one sick puppy for sure...as sad and pathetic as that is.

Anonymous said...

Right, I post every horrible thing on here that you three or four don't like. For your information, I only posted on here a few times and never will again. What a horrible, judgemental place this is. And what a brilliant deduction that I am the same person posting at 2:52 and 4:20, seeing as I told you I was. Idiots.

jojo said...

612,
you sound poor. your time would be better spent surfing the net for discount ground beef and day old bread.

Anonymous said...

Oh, can you get that online?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 7:50am, I have to respond to some of your statements. I did not see what you said when you originally commented, and now it has been deleted. But, I understand that everyone realizes that it seemed very disparaging toward Jews. According to most people, it reeked of prejudice against Jews.

I think you are missing something. You wrote, "You can't always tell if a person is CHRISTIAN by their style of dress BUT you CAN tell if
Someone is J------, Muslim or Hindu By their outside appearance and again THAT'S why I posted it to give an ACCURATE description. Had she wore a Sari I would have said she was Hindu."

This is very wrong. You can't tell if someone is Jewish by how they dress. First, many Jewish people don't dress in a long skirt and a shirt that covers to the elbows or longer. MOST don't dress like that. Only a few do. AND, people of various religions dress that way. So there is no way you could know she was Jewish solely because she was wearing a long skirt and long sleeved shirt.

Similarly, when someone wears a sari, it does not mean they are Hindu! Anyone can wear a sari if they want to. Maybe they married someone who is Indian or whatever. That does not mean they are Hindu.

You cannot tell that all Muslims are Muslim either.

So, please realize that those statements of yours were indeed ignorant, and try to be more careful in your judgements.

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

LMAO I sound poor. I am womndering if that's a biased remark against the finacially challenged.

Anonymous said...

Wasn't JoJo the name of a dog?

Anonymous said...

My point remains proven. The Christian reference remains up. I love it when I'm right. And no amount of virtual screeching from the harpies that frequent here will change the fact that I'm right.

kim said...

836, aka dumbass-
that post isn't coming down. you're an idiot. you made an offensive remark about Jews and it got deleted. The end.

Go medicate yourself. I am tired of hearing you chirp on this thread.

Be gone, I say.

Anonymous said...

lmaolmaolmao
she got you, girl!
bootlicker!

Anonymous said...

I know it's not coming down because there's a double standard on this site. Kim proves me right again. Anything you guys post just proves me right, the more you say, the more you are really telling me I'm right.

Bootlicker, LOL. Calling names proves me right even more keep doing it. The more you guys respond the happier I am!

fng said...

Wow-quite a flame war we have going on here!

I know I am new to this site and just started posting but the last post makes sense-in a way. Just ignore people who make trouble and they tend to go away.

Also, as a Catholic (Christian)it is a bit offensive to see that reference up there and two wrongs never make a right. If someone posted something offensive about people of the Jewish faith how is doing the same thing about Christians going to make it any better?

Sometimes, if we step back and look at things from a calmer perspective we can see that we are being baited. It isn't always about winning or getting the last word in.

Anonymous said...

Well, then to solve this once and for all:
Those who are offended, please say so. I'm sure Jane Doe would take it down if enough complained. It isn't worth it to leave it up if so many are going to have a fit over it.
7:13 - one vote

Anyone else?
And don't repost, either.
Just give your opinion and why you're offended, we can usually tell if it's the same person.

anoymous1 said...

But I fail to see any disparaging remark about Christians. What was said?

mom said...

Hey guys. I wrote the post where I said my friend was a Christian, and did not watch her kids properly in the bathroom. I am also a Christian. My comment was in no way intended to insult Christians. (Hey , we Christians are the first to realize we are not perfect...and hopefully will readily admit that.)
The reason I mentioned she was Christian at all was merely to point out that there is no particular religion that should be associated with bad parenting...or any other negative stereotype...and that the Jewish reference was both unneceesary and insulting. By posting that somebody of MY OWN FAITH was also capable fo doing the same thing, I thought the question of bias would be ELIMINATED. It's kinda hard to claim discrimination when one is talking about their own "group"...dontcha think?

All of this baiting is coming from ONE person. She is very ill...and she is not lying when she says that she LOVES all of the attention we are giving her.

For 2XAs, please, PLEASE, get somebody who is close to you...somebody you trust, and show them all that you have been writing here..on EVERY THREAD you have been "contributing to" for the past week. Don't hold anything back. Show them EVERYTHING you have written. Please. This is very serious. You need help...for your sake, and ESPECIALLY for the dear children that you nanny for! Jane Doe, is there ANY way you can get her URL and contact the authorities in her area? She is a NANNY for gosh sakes! This is a disaster in the making if she does not get some help. Can you somehow send this whole blog to some authority that can intervene?

cali mom said...

Mom, you are absolutely correct in your first 2 paragraphs, but there is no way of having any authorities track her down until she's done something illegal. and even if there was, it would probably be the biggest ego boost the poor thing has had in 10 years. Ax2, don't bother spewing at me on this because I can smell you a mile away and won't bother. Get back to the tiger board again, there's been some new developments.

Mom, as for your post about that mom, that is just revolting. I also do the things you mentioned and it's not overzealous, it's just common sense. I've seen a dad take a kid into the gross public bathroom at a local playground with both of them barefoot and I can't believe anyone would walk around in all the pee-puddles and bits of used tissues like that BAREFOOT. GROSS!

fg said...

Hi Mom
I don't believe for one minute that "she" is a nanny but more likely, you might find her working at a local Circle K or Seven Eleven, although probably not lasting long at any job due to her mental illness. I went to her website awhile back out of curiosity and it seems she's made several disgusting, vulgar, and extremely amateur short videos featuring those two bulbous chest appendages hanging off of her oddly shaped body. Oh, and "she" also sings! I almost fell out of my chair laughing while perusing her site, although I have no intention of ever revisiting the site. She also has some inane, senseless writings on her site, including comments indicating her indignation over her videos being banned and pulled from UTube. I'm sure she'd love to be a bonafide porno star but there is simply nothing sexy or appealing about this angry psychotic cow.

§mpp§ said...

oh. my. gawd.
@@
lmao, I must've missed that pic.

"and extremely amateur short videos featuring those two bulbous chest appendages hanging off of her oddly shaped body" ...

'nuff said.

Anonymous said...

O.k.
"She" will probably love this, but I'm going nuts here trying to find an old post to see her picture.
Is this the same person:
Em
2xAs
?
Where is an old post?

mom said...

Shucks, I was hoping that maybe she could be traced because of her mental health issue...in case she is a danger to herself or the children.
But I HOPE you are right and that she is lying about being a nanny, as she seems to do about so many other things. It breaks my heart to think of children exposed to that angry, angry, deranged behavior day after day. But then, she would not have been able to hide it from parents for too long (hopefully), so that does make it far less likley that she is a working nanny after all.

Best case...perhaps she is actually writing all of this from the safety of a mental health facility rec room. (And no, I am not trying to insult the mentally ill. I have a beloved uncle who suffers from a serious mental illness that leaves him seeming normal at times and requires occasional confinement for his own sake. When somebody is mentally ill it is not their fault.)

2XA's please get some help. Life does not have to be like this. Again, please show your posts (all of them, on every site you visit) to somebody you trust. Somebody needs to know.

Anonymous said...

mom
Is 2xAs and Em the same person? Who else did she go by? And where is her pic at?

mom said...

OK here is a description. I don't want to give her any publicity by naming her website.
Picture a dark headed drag queen with way too much makeup. The picture was cropped very close in, so that we saw most, but not all, of her head form a side view. Most prominently were her boobs, which were prominently displayed in a very low cut top, and the photo was cut off just below where the top started to cover them up...which appears to be because she had something under them to hold them up. They were sticking straight out like torpedos, despite the fact that they appeared to have the consistency of three day old water balloons served up on a platter...so they likely dangle and swing when not served up on something for a photo.
Got the picture?

Anonymous said...

I hate to say it, but I get the idea.
But she's getting the attention she craves every time we mention her - so that doesn't matter anyway. This looks like it goes was back to at least the beginning of summer (around May)?

Anonymous said...

Can't remember excatly when...but yes, several months. Now let's follow our own instincts and simply be DONE even discussing her. She loves it and it gets her going even more.

Anonymous said...

jmt disappeared. ro disappeared. ble disappeared.

what happened?

Anonymous said...

Idiots. I am NOT 2xa's or whoever this chick you hate was. Put down the Bon Bons, switch off Jerry Springer re-runs, and try to wrap the 2 brain cells God gave you around the fact that there are other people out there that might dislike the animal farm that's controlled by the pigs like Mom and MaryPoopinPills (mispelling intentional)

You guys sound like a bunch of angry, ugly fat witches. First you attack me, then you attack some other poor soul who tries to be reasonable. And you accuse us each of being the same person as some other sicko obviously of your ilk. I will say this, though. You have provided myself and my husband as well as my co-workers with endlaess laughs. Later sickos.

Anonymous said...

Our "ilk?" You are a whacked out freak, Bootlicker (aka 2AXs)!

§marypoppin'pills§ said...

You gave yourself away ...
Only 2xAs/Em ever used the word "ilk" REPEATEDLY!
Dumbass.

Anonymous said...

You just don't want your family or co-workers (you actually have a job?) .... to know YOU'RE A PSYCHO!

§marypoppin'pills§ said...

BTW, bitch
What did I do but say I missed your pic to deserve your little commentary?
You attacked me several weeks ago for nothing also ...
I think I may have misspelled a word or something.
What is your problem?
Have you nothing better to do?

Anonymous said...

LMAO once again, you make me and my co-workers laugh. I guess no one else can use the word ilk, it belongs to your psycho friend in your mind. Guess what, there are people in the great big world out there beyond blogs, and chatrooms and online communities that actually have an extensive vocabulary! I wish there was a way to prove I am not this 2@xa person, just to prove how dumb MaryTakinpills really is. Personality expert INDEED! You never fail to rise to the bait. Thanks!

Anonymous said...

You are a psycho, 12:54
Are you on a lunch break or something? Maybe it would serve you better to go and see a shrink.

Anonymous said...

I hope you and your co-workers don't forget to break out the popcorn.
And choke on it.

Anonymous said...

Shhhh! Leave her alone. She's taking on another one of her many personalities. Ignore her!

Anonymous said...

Actually, MPP, you annoyed me when you accused me earlier of being someone I am definitely not and backed up your accusations with your know it all crap about being a personality expert.

By the way, ilk was suggested to me by my co-worker, maybe he's Ax2 or whoever, or maybe my supervisor is...maybe this Ax2 is EVERYWHERE ARRRRRRRRRRGH! LOL

Actually, we had some down time these past few days while our office switched systems over. Like I said, I made a post, my first one here and got attacked, accused and had it deleted because of the proven double standard that exists on this site.

Then, some other random person comes and tried to be reasonable and you attack them to and accuse them and me of being this Ax2 person. Paranoid much?

The truth is I was passing time when I found this site and thought I might make a comment. You guys took that comment the wrong way and lashed out in true, online community, megalomaniac form. One of my co-workers then advised me that that if I kept it up, and presented the right bait, the true net-addicted losers would show themselves quickly and you have. But sadly my fun here must end as we are leaving early today and come Monday morning our sytems will be up and we won't have time to play anymore. It really is a shame that I can't prove to you I really am not this Ax2 person, if nothing else, to show you guys more than one person in the world can use the word Ilk.

Have a great weekend and thanks for the fun!

mpp said...

O.k., I'll give it to you. But some of us here have been put through the grind by this person and whenever we do, we assume it's 'her'.
But why would your co-worker want to bait us? If this was your 1st time here, what were we being baited for?

paul the intern said...

Future use of the word ilk and future reference to the two A's or speculation that anyone is or has associations with the two A's will be met with an iron fist and your ip number will be blocked from visiting this site.

Anonymous said...

Jane, does paul work with you?

Jane Doe said...

No, Paul doesn't work with me-but he has sent me his resume on more than one occasion. If only I had the right position for him...

§marypoppin'pills§ said...

lol ... he's definately got a great sense of humor.
Dark and sarcastic.

He makes a good 'Blog Monitor'!
I feel like I'm supposed to behave when he's around.

cali mom said...

OK, guess this quote: "Everything all you bitches say just proves me right!".

At the risk of incurring Paul's wrath, can't we all think of at least 3 names that have obsessively used that line of, um, I guess they call it "reasoning", when they are screeching more and more maniacally aboout whatever bug has crawled northwards in their posterior? And doesn't this latest nutbag echo that argument essentially?

§marypoppin'pills§ said...

I know. And I didn't understand this whole "baiting" thing, either. She said, "You never fail to rise to the bait".
If this was 'her' 1st time, (which I don't think it was) why say that?

And I would hope Paul will give us a free pass on this one.

fng said...

A few years back, in college a psych professor assigned our class to go into online communities and "bait" them. The idea was to see what the results were. I didn't care for the assignment but took part in it. We were actually given a short list of trigger words and phrases he felt would incite people in an online community and "ilk" was one of them, as was "your kind", wenches (in a mostly female community) and I can't remember the rest. Now, my cousin in Texas is in college and has the same type of assignment although not exactly the same. I am wondering if this might not have been something like that. If not college students maybe an armchair psychiatrist bored and looking for kicks. Just a thought.

I still think the best way to deal with this stuff is to completely ignore it. People really do get something out of getting others all worked up.

mom said...

Yikes.
I'm glad Paul the Intern's comment was not approved by Jane Doe. I thought about it while I was on vacation this weekend and decided it did not sound at all like a policy she would adopt. After all, "she who shall not be named" has made a serious and ongoing effort to destroy this blog. Why would Jane Doe not want us to "out" her when she is recognized, so that we regulars, and anybody here who may be new and unfamiliar, will have fair warning to immediately stop respponding to her posts?

And Mary poppin pills, you do not need to apologize for recognizing her on this thread. You made no mistake. This is most definitely her. As usual, she became desperate, sloppy, and started tipping her hand. And, as usual, when we made it known that we knew it was definitley her, she became totally unglued and posted a long, crazy rant a la Peace/Em/2XA, so full of implausible scenarios, desperate denials, over the top anger, and littered with "her" "typical" claims that it left no doubt whatsoever that it is her.

I mean really. Imagine ANY possible scenario where the "syatems are down" at the office, but all computers are nevertheless mysteriously operational, for a period of at least two weeks, during which employees are allowed to troll the internet (in groups, no less) from morning to night in lieu of doing any actual work. Quite coincidentally, one such group happens accidentally upon ISYN, for the first time ever, and somebody (other than the weirdo actually doing all of the writing) goads her into "baiting" us for fun (coincidentally, the same thing 2XAs was so proud to tell us was her intention...and even more coincidentally, in the same writing/argument style and using the same words as our own resident crazy, despite the fact that she has never been here before.) Hmmmm. Now a bunch of them are apparently crowded around having a fabulous time watching her do all of this writing, but never participating in any of it themselves. At some point, one coworker (I imagine likely the the fuzzy headed kid from Welcome back Kotter) suddenly becomes very excited, raises his hand, bounces uncontrollably in his seat and starts saying, "I know! I know! Say 'ilk!' Use the word 'ilk.' PLEEEAAASSSEE, say 'ilk.' It'll be soooo GREAT!" Worn down by his insistence, she finally succumbs to the pressure and unknowingly and unwittingly uses the word that, unbeknownst to her, of course, is the hallmark of "she." Uh huh.
That's a pretty reasonable explanation....NOT!

Here is the weirdest "coincidence' of all. Apparently despite the fact that her plan to "bait' and irritate us has worked splendidly, and we are all now aggrivated and telling her she is not welcome here, and that we recognize her...instead of being satisfied that she has "accomplished" so successfully the thing she set out to do and being happy, she instead becomes enraged and unhinged. Why would this upset her so much when, based on her caims, she should be very happy and satisfied with herself? More mysteriously, this is exactly what happens on a regular basis with "she." Hmmmmm.

Really? You want us to believe that, instead of being who you clearly ARE, you are instead simply the unluckiest person in the world...."framed" by a voluminous set of "mere coincidences?" Uh huh.

We recognize you. We are tired of you. And, although we hate to give you the satisfaction of mentioning your name and letting you read about yourself (while likely drooling on your keyboard with excitement), we will, when necessary, point you out and warn others that your posts are not worth responding to.


You are a source of great irritation. (Congratulations.) But mostly you are pathetic and a bore. I kinda feel sorry for you actually.

Anonymous said...

I had nothing better to do and went back over a few old posts.
This Psycho is definately "her".
She liked to call us paranoid. (Or at least liked to use that word a lot).
The word "ilk" ... it's just too unusual, and I've never noticed anyone else on here use it - except "her". She signed off (probably by accident, "peace") - that was a dead giveaway. And she also took pride in changing names around (those that are brave enough to not post as anonymous). In quite a few of her posts she would re-arrange her victims name to insult them.
She uses all CAPS when she's mad, and trying to get "her" point across.
She trips herself up saying this was her first time:

"My point is proven by the fact that the Jewish reference was deleted but the Christian one is STILL up there. But then again, what can I expect from a site that has the same people here day after day, possibly hour after hour reading posts (most of them sound fake) where children are being abused or neglected. And if a good sighting is posted, it gets hardly any notice."
(If this was her first time, how does she know all this?)

Then she says:

"Actually, we had some down time these past few days while our office switched systems over. Like I said, I made a post, my first one here and got attacked, accused and had it deleted because of the proven double standard that exists on this site."

She really needs help.

Anonymous said...

"She's" baaaaaaaack.

MommaMia! said...

I've been lurking around this blog for some time making sure none of my friends nannies turn up here. I write as a hobby and just wanted to say I use the word -ilk -all the time. It cracks my kids up!

fg said...

but hopefully you are not like the pathetic, petulant piglet with flatulence of the mouth that likes to stir things up here using sneaky, underhanded methods to post her ignorance for all to see, just as she used to post a picture focusing on her bloated creepy boobs.

Anonymous said...

Bitch, please. Systems down?
You are such a troll.
How do them boots taste?

cali mom said...

Uh huh. Flush. Buhbye.

fg said...

geez, and she went to such lengths with the "office systems down BS" and still, no one bit.

third nipple said...

Where were all you warriors and chieftans when I needed people to line up and pay admission to see my non chestual appendage? A whole lot of attention is being given to ole saggy bags, aka the tranny heffer of Northern California.

Give a girl her props.

Third Nipple said...

I am upset that Heath is gone.

Anonymous said...

3rd nip
Pleeease, I beg you -- pick another moniker. I can't take it!!!

Anonymous said...

better to burn out than fade away
better to burn out than fade away
better to burn out than fade away
better to burn out than fade away


Let's be done with this nonsense. Judging from the background in her pictures, our "friend" is very poor. She had to hang dirty white sheets (hospital grade) as a backdrop for what she thought were sensual pics. It's sad really.

carly said...

I was just reading this and laughing out loud. My sister uses about three gels on her hair. She wears it in a tight bun so she uses an oil based gel to slick the hair down and keep it straight. Then she adds in two products, one for ethnic hair and one called ENDS by Sebastian to pull out chunks of her bun and spike them. The end result is a crispy look. This isn't easily achieved. She spends 30 minutes or so doing her hair, so if she were recognized for her look, I think she would be quite pleased. Not that she is a nanny, this just reminded me of my sister.

Anonymous said...

a little yelling will help the kid in the long run