Received Tuesday, July 31, 2007
This incident transpired Monday,(7/30) mid -afternoon at Cuernavaca Park, in the city of Burlingame, CA. The nanny was a mickle to behold. Long, lush locks of dark hue, the delicately lined lips of a cherub and the sweet skin of a honey dew. She wore a red, clingy top that stretched across her body and revealed a slip of her stomache. Her jeans were low rise, presumed stretch denim and worn close to the bone. Her shoes were nondescript and so I cannot say. Her eyebrows seems drawn on at an improbable arch. Although she looked rather lovely in the mid day sun, she was when managing your child, somewhat of a scourge. I witnessed two time outs given for no reason whatsoever, except the nanny was incapable of aquiring cell phone reception and frustrated for that. The little boy wanted to climb the bars and needed undersupport. To him she said, "if you cant do it yourself, you cant do it". Her accent was subtle. A latina, but as fair as the driven snow. The little boy looked sad and lost. He asked her to watch this or watch that, she rolled her eyes and turned abruptly toward the sea. He asked to go home. Claimed he was hungry and his little legs were tired. She said, "in a minute, in a minute". When he fell and scraped his knee ten minutes later, he cried. She said, "now what" with a bored expression and yanked him up by his arm. He was only a boy of 2 or 3. Wearing a bright blue shirt, with a yellow truck on it, cargo style shorts and little, tevo- style sandals. Should I have been a painter looking to paint a beautiful portrait, I might have chosen she. But I was a parent out with my child, not nanny spotting and yet I found her.
Dude?
ReplyDeleteThank you Danielle Steel for the most amazing writing outside a hardback novel.
ReplyDeletegreat post,great writer but what a lousy nannie
ReplyDeleteSucky nanny, great post though.
ReplyDeleteThat's a really upscale area. And a small park. Someone will know her. That is if one can sort through this attempt at prose.
ReplyDeleteI will admit the writing was pretty cheesy but it got the point across... What age would you say roughly... the nanny was?
ReplyDeleteI have to know if a man wrote this. The nanny sounds harsh and you sound in love, this post made me giggle, but not at the way the little boy was treated.
ReplyDeleteI dunno - I think maybe the nanny was in her 20's, going by the come hither description of her.
ReplyDeletecreepy
ReplyDeleteJennifer Lopez works as a nanny now?
ReplyDeleteweird post
ReplyDeletewell, her Hollywood career seems to be over, so perhaps she is a nanny now, a bitter one, it would seem.
ReplyDeleteAnd she's pure as driven snow!
ReplyDeletemore of an opportunistic bitch loser and how does she do it? I mean, sleep with that greasy little midget?
ReplyDeleteForget being a painter... you trying to be a writer? :)
ReplyDeleteYou are, when writing to this blog, somewhat of a hack.
ReplyDeleteHilarious! A welcome respite from the vacation thread.
ReplyDeleteWith a networth of 100 mill, J lo is neither likely working as a nanny nor is she with her caramel colored complexion, "pure as the driven snow".
ReplyDeleteCatch up.
And the way this child was treated is sad. I often word how these nannies turn on the charm for the parents though!
What in God's name is a mickle?
ReplyDeletesweet skin of a honey dew....
ReplyDeleteNow, who needs to catch up, eh?
This is a VERY Creepy post.
ReplyDeleteHAHAHAHAHA!!! That's the hardest I have ever laughed while reading a post on this site. I especially liked the face at the beginning, he seems to be saying "ummmmmmmmmmm... huh?" And if either of you would care to look it says "... as fair as the driven snow." But did you really think that commenter was serious about it being J-Lo? HAHA priceless!
ReplyDeleteif you mouse over the face, it says, "hmmmm".
ReplyDeleteso pure as the driven snow
flesh like a melon
& details of her stomach
this nasty nanny may be in danger of being stalked.
what is wrong with you people. a person sends in a perfectly normal nanny sighting and once again you attack the op. grow up people and act like adults. stop picking at unimportant things. the care of the kids is important. stop it please
ReplyDeleteForget I saw your nanny. Try BadPornRus. How horrible.
ReplyDelete6:21- well, since you said please....>:)
ReplyDeleteUmm...is it me or is this post a little, well...icky? I mean go ahead and let us know about the crappy nanny, but does the OP have to be quite so pervy about it?
ReplyDelete*washing my eyes*
seriosuly, i am grossed out by this post.
ReplyDeleteI wasn't grossed out per se. I was just horrified by the few posters who thought this was good writing ... I have never read anything so pretentious and overdone in my life
ReplyDelete741,
ReplyDeleteita.
"she rolled her eyes and turned abruptly toward the sea."
lmao
having said that, I do appreciate the attention to detail and the outing of another crappy nanny. Even if you send in a limerick, as long as the info is true and relevant-I'm down.
However, I wish more people took pictures.
I must say this post was written a little dramatically, my problem is that the Author of it took away any chance of the readers being interested in what was happening to the child. Maybe he/she could find another blog to post their 'novella' on ... in the mean time, let's wade through this post and remember we have a child that needs attention from neglect.
ReplyDeleteTo the OP: we would love to hear back from you and find out if you are m or f, and what you thought of our comments, now that you've got all of us going.
IMO the OP was looking for reaction! This isn't bashing of the OP, but is giving him/her what they asked for.
ReplyDeleteI disagree. Although I think it was written in a weird, not even grammatically correct way- I like the way it sounds. It made it more interesting to read and the details stuck in my head. It has a rythm to it. Spice is nice, right?
ReplyDeleteanyone remember "sugar in the raw"?
I think it's a guy thing?
WWJMTT
ReplyDeleteWhat would JMT think?
I think the post may be fake. It looks like a joke. I hope OP didn't make this up to be funny, although if he/she did, at least that would mean one less child with a lousy nanny.
ReplyDeleteSeriously, who writes like this? You're posting on Isawyournanny.com and not on the National Literary Foundation site. Give it a rest, you made my mind hurt.
ReplyDeleteOP covered all of the basics, when this happend, where it happend, described the child and the nanny.
ReplyDeleteIt's different than the usual posts but who cares? Maybe the person who wrote it was flaming. Some people are just more flowery.
There is no isawyournanny.com,
ReplyDeleteit is isawyournanny.blogspot.com
Ummmmmm...I have a question: what was HIS kid doing while he was admiring this nanny's features? It's clear he wasn't paying any attention to his for that instant he was caught up in his "rapture".
ReplyDeleteMaybe his kid was older? I think there are basketball courts there.
ReplyDeleteBeen awhile, but I think.
Did we ever find out what a mickle is????
ReplyDelete(mkl) Scots
ReplyDeletemickle definition
adj.
Great.
adv.
Greatly.
mickle etymology
[Middle English mikel, from Old English micel and from Old Norse mikill; see meg- in Indo-European roots.]
Bad nanny or not...I hope she stays far away from the guy who wrote this.
ReplyDeleteI think he/she meant mickel as "a sight to behold"
ReplyDeletefrom wordweb, USA
creeeeepy...very creepy
ReplyDeleteWhere are you @ DISNEY WORLD. WTF
ReplyDeleteThis writing is almost as bad as "The Manny".
ReplyDeleteThat is some of the most tortured prose I have ever encountered.
ReplyDeleteAwful writing... and kind of nasty that someone was getting a happy while writing about someone being a jerk to a little kid.
ReplyDeleteIf the spelling and grammar were better, it would have almost been well done. If anything, maybe the author (who I would bet money is a male) was trying to illustrate the stark contrast between her intense physical beauty, and her hideous, monstrous personality. Just my guess...
ReplyDeleteI think the poor deluded chap was trying to show off his writing skills! Poor sap.
ReplyDelete