Tuesday

Cuernavaca Park in Burlingame, CA

Received Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Hmmmmm.. This incident transpired Monday,(7/30) mid -afternoon at Cuernavaca Park, in the city of Burlingame, CA. The nanny was a mickle to behold. Long, lush locks of dark hue, the delicately lined lips of a cherub and the sweet skin of a honey dew. She wore a red, clingy top that stretched across her body and revealed a slip of her stomache. Her jeans were low rise, presumed stretch denim and worn close to the bone. Her shoes were nondescript and so I cannot say. Her eyebrows seems drawn on at an improbable arch. Although she looked rather lovely in the mid day sun, she was when managing your child, somewhat of a scourge. I witnessed two time outs given for no reason whatsoever, except the nanny was incapable of aquiring cell phone reception and frustrated for that. The little boy wanted to climb the bars and needed undersupport. To him she said, "if you cant do it yourself, you cant do it". Her accent was subtle. A latina, but as fair as the driven snow. The little boy looked sad and lost. He asked her to watch this or watch that, she rolled her eyes and turned abruptly toward the sea. He asked to go home. Claimed he was hungry and his little legs were tired. She said, "in a minute, in a minute". When he fell and scraped his knee ten minutes later, he cried. She said, "now what" with a bored expression and yanked him up by his arm. He was only a boy of 2 or 3. Wearing a bright blue shirt, with a yellow truck on it, cargo style shorts and little, tevo- style sandals. Should I have been a painter looking to paint a beautiful portrait, I might have chosen she. But I was a parent out with my child, not nanny spotting and yet I found her.

51 comments:

  1. Thank you Danielle Steel for the most amazing writing outside a hardback novel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. great post,great writer but what a lousy nannie

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sucky nanny, great post though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's a really upscale area. And a small park. Someone will know her. That is if one can sort through this attempt at prose.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I will admit the writing was pretty cheesy but it got the point across... What age would you say roughly... the nanny was?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have to know if a man wrote this. The nanny sounds harsh and you sound in love, this post made me giggle, but not at the way the little boy was treated.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I dunno - I think maybe the nanny was in her 20's, going by the come hither description of her.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jennifer Lopez works as a nanny now?

    ReplyDelete
  9. well, her Hollywood career seems to be over, so perhaps she is a nanny now, a bitter one, it would seem.

    ReplyDelete
  10. And she's pure as driven snow!

    ReplyDelete
  11. more of an opportunistic bitch loser and how does she do it? I mean, sleep with that greasy little midget?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Forget being a painter... you trying to be a writer? :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. You are, when writing to this blog, somewhat of a hack.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hilarious! A welcome respite from the vacation thread.

    ReplyDelete
  15. With a networth of 100 mill, J lo is neither likely working as a nanny nor is she with her caramel colored complexion, "pure as the driven snow".

    Catch up.

    And the way this child was treated is sad. I often word how these nannies turn on the charm for the parents though!

    ReplyDelete
  16. What in God's name is a mickle?

    ReplyDelete
  17. sweet skin of a honey dew....
    Now, who needs to catch up, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is a VERY Creepy post.

    ReplyDelete
  19. HAHAHAHAHA!!! That's the hardest I have ever laughed while reading a post on this site. I especially liked the face at the beginning, he seems to be saying "ummmmmmmmmmm... huh?" And if either of you would care to look it says "... as fair as the driven snow." But did you really think that commenter was serious about it being J-Lo? HAHA priceless!

    ReplyDelete
  20. if you mouse over the face, it says, "hmmmm".

    so pure as the driven snow
    flesh like a melon
    & details of her stomach

    this nasty nanny may be in danger of being stalked.

    ReplyDelete
  21. what is wrong with you people. a person sends in a perfectly normal nanny sighting and once again you attack the op. grow up people and act like adults. stop picking at unimportant things. the care of the kids is important. stop it please

    ReplyDelete
  22. Forget I saw your nanny. Try BadPornRus. How horrible.

    ReplyDelete
  23. 6:21- well, since you said please....>:)

    ReplyDelete
  24. Umm...is it me or is this post a little, well...icky? I mean go ahead and let us know about the crappy nanny, but does the OP have to be quite so pervy about it?

    *washing my eyes*

    ReplyDelete
  25. seriosuly, i am grossed out by this post.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I wasn't grossed out per se. I was just horrified by the few posters who thought this was good writing ... I have never read anything so pretentious and overdone in my life

    ReplyDelete
  27. 741,
    ita.
    "she rolled her eyes and turned abruptly toward the sea."
    lmao
    having said that, I do appreciate the attention to detail and the outing of another crappy nanny. Even if you send in a limerick, as long as the info is true and relevant-I'm down.
    However, I wish more people took pictures.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I must say this post was written a little dramatically, my problem is that the Author of it took away any chance of the readers being interested in what was happening to the child. Maybe he/she could find another blog to post their 'novella' on ... in the mean time, let's wade through this post and remember we have a child that needs attention from neglect.
    To the OP: we would love to hear back from you and find out if you are m or f, and what you thought of our comments, now that you've got all of us going.

    ReplyDelete
  29. IMO the OP was looking for reaction! This isn't bashing of the OP, but is giving him/her what they asked for.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I disagree. Although I think it was written in a weird, not even grammatically correct way- I like the way it sounds. It made it more interesting to read and the details stuck in my head. It has a rythm to it. Spice is nice, right?

    anyone remember "sugar in the raw"?
    I think it's a guy thing?

    ReplyDelete
  31. WWJMTT

    What would JMT think?

    ReplyDelete
  32. I think the post may be fake. It looks like a joke. I hope OP didn't make this up to be funny, although if he/she did, at least that would mean one less child with a lousy nanny.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Seriously, who writes like this? You're posting on Isawyournanny.com and not on the National Literary Foundation site. Give it a rest, you made my mind hurt.

    ReplyDelete
  34. OP covered all of the basics, when this happend, where it happend, described the child and the nanny.

    It's different than the usual posts but who cares? Maybe the person who wrote it was flaming. Some people are just more flowery.

    ReplyDelete
  35. There is no isawyournanny.com,
    it is isawyournanny.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  36. Ummmmmm...I have a question: what was HIS kid doing while he was admiring this nanny's features? It's clear he wasn't paying any attention to his for that instant he was caught up in his "rapture".

    ReplyDelete
  37. Maybe his kid was older? I think there are basketball courts there.
    Been awhile, but I think.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Did we ever find out what a mickle is????

    ReplyDelete
  39. (mkl) Scots
    mickle definition
    adj.
    Great.
    adv.
    Greatly.
    mickle etymology
    [Middle English mikel, from Old English micel and from Old Norse mikill; see meg- in Indo-European roots.]

    ReplyDelete
  40. Bad nanny or not...I hope she stays far away from the guy who wrote this.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I think he/she meant mickel as "a sight to behold"
    from wordweb, USA

    ReplyDelete
  42. creeeeepy...very creepy

    ReplyDelete
  43. Where are you @ DISNEY WORLD. WTF

    ReplyDelete
  44. This writing is almost as bad as "The Manny".

    ReplyDelete
  45. That is some of the most tortured prose I have ever encountered.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Awful writing... and kind of nasty that someone was getting a happy while writing about someone being a jerk to a little kid.

    ReplyDelete
  47. If the spelling and grammar were better, it would have almost been well done. If anything, maybe the author (who I would bet money is a male) was trying to illustrate the stark contrast between her intense physical beauty, and her hideous, monstrous personality. Just my guess...

    ReplyDelete
  48. I think the poor deluded chap was trying to show off his writing skills! Poor sap.

    ReplyDelete

WE LOVE YOUR COMMENTS!
Email ideas, pictures, suggestions, complaints, sightings, stories and features to isynblog@gmail.com