Received Friday, August 31, 2007
My camera did not get this in time. If it did, I wouldn't be supplying the photo to this site anyway. Here is what happened. The nanny is walking outside Roosevelt Park heading north on Forsyth Street. I am innocently standing at the corner of Rivington & Forsyth. The nanny is pushing a basic stroller. It wasn't a fancy pram or buggy or bug. It was grayish and black with baby blue.Or maybe the baby blue was a blanket. The baby was under a year and African American. The nanny was very white. She looked Swedish or Norwegian with white blonde hair and no hint of a tan. She was wearing slip in shoes with a heel, pant shorts that came to the knee and a top that was colored like a lime, tight around the torso and then skirted out so it fell down to mid thigh. As I am standing there minding my own business, I look up. It is after all an attractive woman. She turns to look behind her, really stretch her neck and bam. Her top drops down and her entire "bust" is suddenly there. Since I missed the chance to get a picture for my collection, I thought I would send this to you. Mommies and nannies, gird your children's eyes because I don't know where this nanny was headed, could be your playground. In all seriousness, it was inexplicably inappropriate!
That she had a wardrobe accident? Sheesh, you make it sound as if she purposely pop out a boob for your amusement! I am sure she was embarassed and fixed the problem right away.
ReplyDeleteOh come on, now. What a stupid post this is. So it accidentally dropped down, wow how is this a bad sighting. Sounds like your jealous, because she had a nice figure. Maybe, go to the gym and then you can buy some nice clothes too
ReplyDeleteI'm a 37 year old male. I enjoyed the show, but I also have three children who aren't back in school yet and are out on the same streets with their mother.
ReplyDeleteSo, do you think the kids are going to need therapy now?
ReplyDeleteand women should never ever dare have a problem with their clothes while out in public because your children would be appalled? i am sorry, things happen. This woman did nothing wrong.
ReplyDeleteI have seen some barely dressed nannies and mommies out there. One does not have to bare it all to look great. That is just hoochie.
ReplyDeleteMDC you wrote this post??
ReplyDeleteIf so she probably saw you staring at her you probably had your tongue out like a dog and drooling.
You sound like a freaking pervert. You have a collection of pictures on you. Probably, a stalker with no life.
ReplyDeleteThis nanny wasn't being a "hoochie."
ReplyDeleteHer shorts went all the way to her knee. Nobody says anything to the women wearing shorts that don't even cover their butt cheeks.
The top doesn't even sound like it was bad, until it fell and she was exposed. She was probably embarrassed and I would bet she won't be wearing that top out in public without something under it.
She did nothing wrong. Accidents happen all the time. No child is going to be scarred by the accidental view.
But just so you know, it is illegal to photograph that. If she saw you trying to take a picture of it and called the cops, you could be in trouble for pornography without her permission. Perverted morons need to stay off these boards.
Where did you go to law school? You papa's toilet?
ReplyDeleteIt isn't against the LAW!
Foolface!
Honey, why do you think people have to sign all those release forms before they are filmed or photographed for porn?
ReplyDelete2:47 is correct. I won a lawsuit from a man photographing my dress lifting up. And I only had my undergarments showing.
oh honey, that isn't true. you are a liar. you only need to block out a PART of the person's face. In this case, the money shot is on the ta tas. Who cares about her face?
ReplyDeletePerfectly legal.
Just go to flicker. They have stalker sites devoted to women's asses and feet. And the women dont know they are on there! And their faces are not even blocked.
Wow...
ReplyDeleteI love when grown men are so set on being right and not being the one in the wrong that they call people they don't know liars.
This is just a stupid sighting, period. She didn't do anything wrong. Whichever way you swing it, you're a pervert and you WERE in the wrong. Whether or not the law is on your side.
(And btw, did you ever think that laws are different in different places? You can't call someone a liar without knowing the laws where they live. You're an idiot. Go back to your studio apartment and fiddle around with your collection some more.)
What type of sighting is this?
ReplyDeleteHow you described her clothes, she wasn't dressed in any inappropriate way. She had a wardrobe malfunction, and I'm sure she will never let it happen again. This isn't a place to put embarrassing accidents, it's for child endangerment or abuse.
A woman accidently showed a boob. Let's all move on.
soooo .... a year-old baby has never seen a boobie?
ReplyDeleteLOL!
ReplyDeleteI never mentioned anything about the law. However I do believe that anyone is free to take pictures of anything in public for their own house. The law comes in to play when one sets about publishing said pictures. I don't even know how we got on to this!
ReplyDeleteWe got onto this because of this retarded posting
ReplyDeleteOnly ignorant people use that word like that!
ReplyDeleteThis was writen by some perv who just wants to see his sick fantasies online. He even said he wanted a pic for his "collection."
ReplyDeleteSo you could see her boobs for a sec. Big Deal. Happens to everyone.
This is not a nanny sighting and should not have been posted. This is just some sick-ass wanting to get off on his little encounter being online.
Word to the wise: All women have breasts, all children know it. They have most likely all seen one or two and will most definitely see more. Get over it.
ReplyDeleteI work in an office surrounded by women who check this site on a regular basis. I thought I had something to offer. And quite frankly, so did they.
ReplyDeleteI think the OP is a hormonal fifteen year old boy. I can't imagine an adult man, let alone a father posting this.
ReplyDeleteI wish J.D. would delete this post, before the poor woman is caused further embarrassment!
OP, FYI, the woman could be the mother, if her husband is black, or the child is adopted.
mdc, I think you sound like a disgusting pervert, and if my top had accidently fallen down in-front of you and you had snapped a picture you bet your sweet ass I'd be suing (regardless of what the law states...many, MANY women have WON these cases!) Nudity is a bit different, from non-nudity my friend, that is why security cameras are NOT placed inside fitting rooms in stores! You are absolutely disgusting. This nanny sounds like she was dressed very nicely, and you sound completely pathetic...get laid more often so you can stop staring at other women... and just one final note to you, men who stare at me like that get laughed at later when my husband and I are doing it...
ReplyDeleteWhat an ass! This sentence alone - "Since I missed the chance to get a picture for my collection, I thought I would send this to you." - puts you in the pervert category. It sounds more like it was the highlight of your day (life?) to actually SEE a breast rather than some casual incident where a womans top slipped.
ReplyDeleteGet over yourself!
Ok, at first I thought she "flashed" or even "flashed you" specifically. But, all these comments about wardrobe malfunction that you aren't disputing makes me think that I'm wrong. So her top malfunctioned? What's the point of this post? Why are you wasting space and time on this? Maybe you should step away from the ladies and ask to have your cubicle moved? And, well, I guess you are a guy and most of us aren't, so I see how excited you are by this. But, geez, I gotta follow the pack on this a contend that you are a pervert indeed by adding in that you would have taken a picture!
ReplyDeleteFYI it is actually LEGAL to go topless in NYC. It really is (now I wouldn't say it's smart, obvs)! Don't believe me, check it out:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.avalon5.com/index.php/law/this-is-legal-in-new-york-aint-crazy-laws-wonderful/
Anyway—what are you, in 4th grade? And also, how do you know this woman wasn't the mother with an adoptedd baby? You need therapy to get over your repressed view of the world. Or move to Utah.
JD...why is this post even here? There are plenty of voyeur and porn sites this guy can go to to get his jollies.
ReplyDeleteMaybe, Tiger Woods wife was in town. Shes a beautiful woman from Sweden with a baby. Then again I am sure security is always with her! Because of people like you
ReplyDeleteIt was Heidi Klum.
ReplyDelete??? Tiger Woods wife is from Sweden originally
ReplyDeleteTo those of you who have said, "why is this here" and "why doesn't JD take this down" have you considered that postings do not magically find their way to this blog. JD has to put herself and her blog out there. In the blogosphere, this means listing your blog and signing up for best of type questions. If you want to see better postings, ask yourself if you have favored this blog on technorati? Are you voting for the blog everyday? Did you vote for this blog for the best blog about stuff in the blogger's choice awards? Normally people don't just give advice without lending some support. In my experience, at least. And I vote everychance I remember and have favorited the blog on technorati and voted the blog for best blog about stuff and best blog design. Thanks to you all for listening. I roll my eyes at this 'sighting'. But blog's dont survive without being updated daily. You have to work tirelessly to keep the name of your blog out there. The people who read this blog are mostly non bloggers, so while you cannot help with links and traffic you can spread the word about the blog and support it in other ways.
ReplyDeleteThank you & I hope you all have a happy holiday weekend.
Gee...thanks for clearing that up for us Jennifer. Are you JD's publicist?
ReplyDeleteshe's a blogger.
ReplyDeleteI agree. I sign on this site to read nanny sightings, preferably bad ones. I'm not so keen on the good ones or the questions.
ReplyDeleteAbout that top-
ReplyDeletefaulty elastic
... garments from China have been made with rotting material and elastic. I am pretty sure that this is what happened. I purchased a white skirt, the popular full cotton with layers of material and an attached white slip underneath. On the third wearing, the slip underneath tore, but not at the seam. It tore inexplicably at an area not particularly stressed... just rotten. I wore the skirt twice more with a neutral colored slip underneath and thought to myself, "WOW! I am losing weight", only to find out that the elastic had stretched all out already making the skirt fall down. No, no weight loss, just more rotting going on. I will now check anything I buy to see if it is made in China and I will not buy another thing made there. I am pretty sure that woman's top was made in China.
Your wife didn't breastfeed?
ReplyDeleteNever mind. Don't answer.
Let's just go with this: if your children have never seen breasts before, they will soon, and it probably won't be the breasts of a nanny.
I like this sighting though. It amused me.
3:02, that was my first thought! Why it's a huge deal if a baby sees a breast is beyond me...obviously this was more excitement than OP had had in quite a while though and couldn't contain himself. LOL!
ReplyDeletethere is NO doubt, but that the op thoroughly enjoyed is sighting. Usually his sightings are thru pane-glass windows at night, so this was a nice change for him
ReplyDelete6:54: WTH??? Yeah I am sure that what happened!
ReplyDeletenow that there were no sightings as they are called on saturday, i think i would welcome another wardrobe malfunction. quick, i need someone to judge!
ReplyDelete10:24, haha, completely agree!
ReplyDeleteIs this the first time you've ever seen a strangers breasts while not peering through her bushes and half closed drapes? haha
Your nasty bud...
well sommeone certainly is having a ball going around and photoging mommies and making snide comments.
ReplyDeletehttp://flickr.com/photos/sarahjoie/181363834/
http://flickr.com/photos/sarahjoie/181368210/
You are one sick and troubled dude. Get some help.
ReplyDeletemdc, your photo "proof" that there are other perverts out there like yourself, does nothing to compliment you or make you look any less creepy. One should realize that the internet is not exactly the best place to prove normality. There are lots of "lovely" sites on this fine system we call cyber space, for example every thing from bestiality to child pornography...in other words, I don't think proving there are other peeping toms on the internet such as yourself shines any less of a negative light on you. Seek help, you creep me (and obviously many other women, as proof via this post) out...
ReplyDeleteYep, this guy is definitely one sick prick.
ReplyDeleteCan you say "sex offender registry?"
ReplyDeleteEven though I think this guy IS a pervert, he is right about taking a picture of the woman. Out on the sidewalk you would have no reasonable expectation of privacy, so if someone takes your picture there isn't much you can do. For example, the celeb. photos of them half nude...if anyone had a right to sue, it would be them
ReplyDeleteOMG just because your head is in the gutter and you can't keep your eyes off this beautiful girl, does NOT mean she dropped her blouse for your entertainment. It was obviously an accident. If you had forgotten to zip your fly after using the restroom, should we assume that you're a pervert? And the fact that you were wanting a picture for your "collection", really sends up red flags about your appropriateness.
ReplyDeleteIs anyone concerned that a guy like this is reading the posts and learning exact locations/descriptions of nannies who are regularly not paying attention to their kids in parks and other public places?
ReplyDeleteSomeone wanting to abduct a child has a wealth of helpful information provided on this site.